http://www.observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12716&Itemid=80
http://www.observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12707&Itemid=106
http://www.observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12705&Itemid=106
Monday, March 28, 2011
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Check out for Swimming Events in South Africa and Kenya
Coaches interested in events in South Africa and Kenya can check out the following links:
Swimming South Africa
http://www.swimsa.org/
Kenya (NASA)
http://www.nasakenya.co.ke/
Swimming South Africa
http://www.swimsa.org/
Kenya (NASA)
http://www.nasakenya.co.ke/
Holiday swimming programme, Anyone?
What are you doing when the kids go into school holiday? Do you have some organized activity for swimmers this coming school holiday? Share your plans with other coaches here and we will spread the word for you for FREE!
Thursday, March 17, 2011
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
Building coaches' capacity by tapping into our own resources
Good news for USCA!
Coach Max Kanyerezi ably represented Uganda and USCA in the ASCA clinic held in Dar es salam in February this year. Max who was sponsored by his school to attend the course, made a powerful presentation to the more than 65 coaches from 5 countries who attended the course. Mr. John Leornad of ASCA and WSCA facilitated the course.
Coach Max Kanerezi has been certified as a member of World Swimming Coaches Association (WSCA) and will now enjoy the full benefits of WSCA membership.
He, and USCA President, Muzafaru Muwanguzi, who has just returned from Leipzig University in Germany, after a six months scholarship for a swimming diploma course, have accepted to partner in presenting a workshop for coaches in the near future. Coaches will be invited by email.
We are confident that these two coaches will generate greater enthusiasm among the members of the coaching community to further their skills and keep the momentum of building and supporting the sport.
Coaches attending the Level 3 ASCA course in Dar es salam in Tanzania
Source: ASCA website : http://www.swimmingcoach.org/
Sunday, March 13, 2011
Aga Khan Junior Championships results and news links
Catch the latest news on the last weekend's junior event at Kololo
http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/30/748984
http://sports.bkchoices.com/?p=802
http://sports.bkchoices.com/?p=773
http://www.newvision.co.ug/D/8/30/748984
http://sports.bkchoices.com/?p=802
http://sports.bkchoices.com/?p=773
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Inspiring performance at the Aga Khan School Kampala Swimming Championships
Brilliant display of skills from the kids at the annual Aga Khan Swimming Championships today. There is a thing that coaches always do in this gala year after year: Inspiring the next generation of swimmers and keeping alive their dreams in setting the pace for the future of Uganda swimming.
USCA salutes all the swimmers who turned up and congratulates the kids who earned themselves various prizes. We are proud of great work of the coaches who make this happen.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
USCA members registration starts on a high note.
Today's meeting marked a new dawn for USCA. 10 new members signed up as members during the Season -opener meeting. A great momentum was created to further support ideas for coaches development. We are grateful for all who attended and are supporting the writing of this part of USCA's history.
Sunday, February 27, 2011
USCA Swimming Coaches Season-Opener Meeting
We are pleased to invite USCA member coaches to the
USCA Swimming Coaches Season-Opener Meeting
- Date: Sunday 6th March 2011
- Time: 1.00pm to 2.30pm
- Venue: Aga Khan Swimming Pool, Kololo
- Business: Registration of all practicing coaches, Setting agenda for 2011, Appointing Task sub-committees
- Requirements: Bring a passport photo for registration,
- Request: Bring along a new coach and introduce him/her to the USCA family, keep time and carry an open mind
Please spread the word to all colleagues.
Peter
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
Friday, February 4, 2011
Thank you
It was great to have the a big number of coaches gathering to welcome Coach Muzafaru. A big "Thank You" goes to all those invisible hands that put the whole party together and of course those who made it in time (and left late).
We look forward to more of such wonderful occasions when we can celebrate our coaches too.
We look forward to more of such wonderful occasions when we can celebrate our coaches too.
Monday, January 31, 2011
Your ideas for 2011
Dear Coaches,
USCA would like to have your ideas about the following:
USCA would like to have your ideas about the following:
- Vision and Mission statement
- USCA logo
- Tentative events for 2011
- Ideas to inform the agenda for the next meeting planned soon.
You can post your comments here or write to uscauganda@gmail.com
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Welcome back Mr. Chairman. Thursday, the coaches meet you at Kololo
USCA Chairman, Mr. Muzafaru Muwanguzi will be returning from Leipzig, Germany where he has been undertaking a 6 months Intensive Swimming coach course. Muzafaru is expected back on Thursday Morning aboard Turkish Airlines.
USCA is pleased to welcome him back and hereby invites member coaches for a Get together party at Kololo Swimming pool (Base) on Thursday 3rd Feb at 6.59pm. It will be a great opportunity to see him back and celebrate together, another milestone for the coaching community.
For more details contact USCA Vice Chair, Mathias Kabbubi (Presdo). Dont Miss!
Thursday, January 20, 2011
USF Intermediate swimming course by Gerd Nottlemann starts Monday 24th Jan 2011. The following coaches who attended level 1 are expected to attend.
1. RONALD DAMULIRA,
2. VINCENT LWANGA,
3. ISAAC SAMBA
4. LUSIMBO VIANNEY
5. SEBAKUMBA RONALD
6. MULUMBA SIMON
7. SENTONGO GODFREY
8. MUHIGANE MMNUEL
9. DAMULIRA ABEL
10. BUTEERA MAJID
11. KANYEREZI MAX
12. GAIRA CONRAD
13. WALAKILA ISAAYA
14. MPUUJA TOM MUTEBI
15. SSEKAMATTE RASHEED
16. PETER MUGISHA SIMON
17. MUGANZI MAPETLA
18. DEUS TUMUSIIMEPlease register with Peter Mugisha-USF Sec. Gen
Confirm attendance to Level 3 ASCA course in Dar, Tanzania asap
Please confirm your intention, this is an urgent request from TSCA, the host.
Friday, January 14, 2011
Interesting article by Doc Counsilman from WSCA and recommended by Gilbert
Hi All,
This is an interesting article by Doc Counsilman, one of the legendary
coaches in American Swimming. Nowadays, ASCA has a Doc Counsilman
Lecture at every ASCA World Clinic to celebrate his contribution to
American, and indeed World Swimming. I urge coaches to spare some time
and read it, and to check out more articles on the ASCA website,
www.swimmingcoach.org. Its an old lecture. I reckon in the 80's but
has wonderful insights that may be helpful to coaches in understanding
how our ways of teaching impacts on our work as coaches.
Below is an article from the "Current Articles" page of the American
Swimming Coaches Association (ASCA) website. It can be found on the ASCA
website here:
http://www.swimmingcoach.org/articles/JL05142002.asp
- - - - - - - - - -
THE "X" FACTOR
by Dr. James "Doc" Counsilman
Is there any one factor or trait that determines a successful swimming
coach? If there is, could we educate a coach to have this particular trait?
The business world has long wondered what makes a good executive, a good
administrator, or a good salesman. Research into this ingredient of
success has led to the use of multimillion-dollar-testing bureaus. For
example, the executives of U.S. Steel are given personality tests,
intelligence tests, leadership ability tests and others in every
possible measurable area. So far they have had very little success in
identifying any single trait that their subjects have in common. For
instance, they sometimes find the lowest-paid filing clerk to have more
basic intelligence than the highest-paid executive. They have determined
that once a person reaches a level of intelligence somewhere above
average, that higher intelligence by itself is not necessarily a
determinant. So, we cannot give all coaches intelligence tests and
determine that the most intelligent will be the best coach. If this were
true, then all we would have to do to select a good coach is hire the
man with the highest I.Q. It might be just the opposite: a man with a
high I.Q. might be too smart to get involved in coaching.
Let's get back to the business world. I personally feel that
intelligence has a lot to do with success in coaching, in business, in
almost any field of endeavor. However, the type of intelligence I am
speaking of is not the type that can be measured by academic testing. It
could better be called a type of "perception". The business school at
Indiana University has found their search for a common denominator from
which to predict success to be rather fruitless. They have, however,
isolated an unidentifiable factor which they have named the "X" factor.
They can't sharply define this factor, but they talk about it, and they
feel they are closing in on a definition. I would like to apply this "X"
factor to swimming coaches.
They know a little about this factor in business, and I would like to
mention a few of the dangers encountered by business in attempting to
build a perfect administrator. Business has sent its top administrators
to training courses very much as you have come to this clinic. They send
them to universities and sometimes to the Menninger Foundation in
Kansas. The most outstanding business training course is given in Kansas
at the Menninger Psychiatric Clinic. Here, three times a year, a course
is offered to top executives at a fee of $1,200. Entrance is limited to
20 per group in three groups, and is called "Understanding Man."
Business sends its top executives to this clinic, the theory being that
with this type of training they will return and do a better job. Just as
many of you have come here and hope to return to your swimmers and do a
better job with them.
Unfortunately, business has found that many of its executives get back
from such a clinic and do worse. Likewise, many of our coaches go home
from these clinics and do a worse job of coaching than before. I can see
some of your kids now saying, "Oh my God, Coach has been to one of those
screwy clinics again. Now we get all of those screwy workouts and those
crazy ideas on stroke mechanics." I believe that we must continue to
experiment, to continually change our programs and our methods.
Therefore I do not recommend that we stop attending clinics such as
this, but I would caution you about one thing. There are examples of men
who have trained themselves to be coaches, devoted their entire lives to
that end, and failed miserably. Some of these men have been warned
before they start that they will fail, just as I now warn some of my
graduate students that they too will fail. Why do they fail? Let us take
a partially-true case and synthesize an individual. Give him a false
name, call him Frank Zilch.
Frank Zilch came to me some years ago and said, "I want to study under
you, learn all that you know, take all the scientific courses available,
so that I can become the greatest swimming coach in the world." Of
course, his approach was wrong; this was not the thing he should have
said. As his graduate advisor, I set out to plan his education.
Theoretically, he had everything going for him: he was good looking, he
had desire, he had lots of energy, he was intelligent, and with good
planning we should be able to make a great coach out of him. But, as it
turned out, it was an impossible task, because he lacked the "X" factor,
which we will discuss later. Frank Zilch read all the research on
swimming he could find; he read "Research Quarterly," "Swimming
Technique," "The Journal of Applied Physiology", and many, many others.
He attended all the coaching clinics he could find, he did research, he
lived, he ate, his every thought and every waking minute was applied to
swimming. We designed his courses to cover every area of knowledge
possible that could contribute toward making him a great swimming coach.
He knew more facts about swimming than any person in the world--his
brain was crammed with swimming knowledge.
In setting up his course of study we tried to give him a full education
in the areas necessary to make him a great swimming coach. He had to be
a great physiologist to understand the process of conditioning: what
happens to the swimmer's body when he trains. The perfect coach should
know that the swimmer's body changes as he trains. He should understand
these physiological changes that occur. In preparing the perfect coach
for this area of knowledge, he should certainly read Dr. Selye's book on
stress and adaptation. Frank Zilch studied all of this.
The thought must occur to you: does all of this really seem necessary?
We all wonder if we should not concentrate on just training the
swimmers, and let Dr. Selye and others do this type of research. Maybe
we should learn by trial-and-error, by either overworking or
underworking our swimmers. Most of the U.S. progress in training
technique has occurred through trial-and-error. The Europeans, in
particular those from the Iron Curtain countries, are usually surprised
and disappointed when they visit training sites in the United States,
and fail to see the American coaches taking pulse rates and
electrocardiograms. They expect American coaches to be more scientific:
they expect us to take pulse rates, they expect us to take
electrocardiograms, and to measure all physiological changes in our
swimmers.
During a recent trip to Russia, I gave an hour lecture at the Russian
Institute for Physical Education in Minsk. During the question and
answer period, the questions were entirely on minute details such as:
"Did the swimmers take vitamins?" "How many milligrams of Vitamin C did
they take?" "Do you measure their electrocardiograms?" They asked no
questions on training of swimmers, on repeats, etc. Later we had a
special conference with officials of the Russian sports field. There
were about six or eight sitting about the table. They had a
nutritionist, an expert on fluid mechanics, a physiologist; the only
thing missing was a swimming coach. Again, the questions were on, in my
opinion, irrelevant subjects. Their favorite question was on the "IT"
wave. Then they asked the 64-ruble question. They wanted to know why
they were not getting better swimmers in spite of spending millions of
rubles. They asked if they were behind the times; they asked what we in
the U.S. were doing that they were not. I told them that they were
actually far ahead of our country in scientific methods, but they did
not understand. I think the Russians are missing the "X" factor.
We have had similar experiences with the East Germans. They too are
going about their swimming on a very scientific basis. They select their
future athletes on a scientific basis, as they are also doing for their
future scientists, mathematicians, physicists. When an East German child
shows promise in any area--math, science, sport, etc.--he and his family
are often moved so the child can be enrolled in a special school or
institute that is designed to nurture this skill. The East Germans, like
the Russians, wonder why they are not having greater success in these
areas. The answer is, again, I believe the "X" factor.
In the United States we throw our 500,000 age-group swimmers into the
pool and let the best survive. The ones that come out on top have the
physical ability and have fought their way to the top through hard,
merciless work. We do not coddle our swimmers. Our swimmers, also the
Canadian and Australian swimmers, are not pampered. We throw them all in
the pool and let the best survive. I favor this system over the
scientific approach of the Russians and East Germans. They approach
things too scientifically and forget that it is a dog-eat-dog
competition. The Americans, the Australians, the Canadians and a few
others produce the toughest swimmers because of the system that forces
them to fight their way to the top. This is why these swimmers are the
toughest in the Olympics and other international meets.
In business they have a saying: you never see a good-looking salesman. I
don't know how really true this is, but possibly he doesn't sell much
because he is too busy with the farmer's daughter. The point is, I
believe: you want to stay away from people who have everything going for
them. I have yet to have a good swimmer who was talented physically and
also well-adjusted. A person can have all the physical and mental
attributes and not do well, because the person with everything going for
him does not have a strong ego-drive. Perhaps this ego-drive is part of
the "X" factor we have been talking about. http://www.swimmingcoach.org/articles/JL05142002.asp
Now back to Frank Zilch.
He had everything going for him. We trained him to be a good
physiologist; now we will train him in stroke mechanics. He studied
physics, fluid mechanics. He studied underwater movies; he learned all
about Bernouili's principle. He studied every aspect of stroke
mechanics. Another area in which the Europeans seem surprised to find
that American coaches are not spending more time on the deck is with
stroke mechanics. I do not believe any coach could teach Mark Spitz to
swim the way he does; much of this he has done on his own. The better a
swimmer is, the less he really has to be coached. If you have a Mark
Spitz, just sit back and enjoy him and try to learn from him.
How does a swimmer learn? He learns through trial-and-error. Why doesn't
everybody learn the same? Because we all have varying abilities.
We have photographed dogs swimming, and have learned that not all dogs
swim naturally--in fact some nearly drowned. We found that at first most
dogs tried to swim with all four feet, then gradually learned to pick up
the hind feet and swim only with the front feet. However, in the case of
the Labrador Retriever, they learned to swim this way usually on the
second time in the water: much sooner than other types of dogs. We
studied the Dachshund, and on the twentieth time in the water he was
still trying to work all four feet and nearly drowned.
I believe the Gary Halls, the John Kinsellas, the Mark Spitzes, are the
Labrador Retrievers. Unfortunately, most of you will get a lot of
Dachshunds in your programs. So many of our great swimmers swim well in
spite of us lousy coaches--those of us who work only with the Labrador
Retrievers have a real advantage. So, you club coaches, keep on sending
us the Labrador Retrievers and keep the Dachshunds.
Those of us with the top-20 college teams just go out and recruit the
Labrador Retrievers from the local coaches, so we don't have to know
very much about stroke mechanics. The better the swimmer, the less you
have to work on stroke mechanics. I believe stroke mechanics are
extremely important, but at the lower levels. The best stroke-mechanics
men in the U.S. are the lesser-known coaches in the local programs.
We now have Frank Zilch well qualified in physiology, and in stroke
mechanics. Next we go to what I feel is the most important area of all:
psychology. This is one area in which the Russians and East Germans were
very complimentary to the Americans. They marveled at the rapport that
American coaches have with American swimmers. They have remarked at what
great psychologists the American coaches are; how they can motivate the
swimmers in spite of the fact that we don't do scientific testing and
don't work with stroke mechanics.
I believe that if you gave three different coaches:
-one a psychologist,
-one a stroke-mechanics expert, and
-one a physiologist,
identical teams, that the psychologist would win every time. A good
psychologist can motivate his swimmers to work hard and to dedicate
themselves to the sport. They can keep the swimmers happy so they will
enjoy the sport and stay with it. They can recruit the best swimmers.
They can handle the city council and the parents. The good psychologist
in time will become a good organizer and administrator, and will have a
large team and attract the Mark Spitzes and the Gary Halls to his team.
So, this is the way to become a good coach.
Finally, let me tell you what I think the "X" factor is in successful
coaching. The "X" factor is, to quote an old saying: the ability to
separate the wheat from the chaff. Another way of expressing it is to
say: you must be able to recognize the important things and work on
them; and to minimize the unimportant. Let me give you an example.
We have seen mothers and fathers, and a few coaches, walking up and down
the pool deck as the swimmer is swimming with dropped elbows,
over-kicking like mad, and he is being yelled at, "kick, kick, kick." In
other words, they ignore the important item, the dropped elbows, and
emphasize the unimportant by yelling "kick, kick."
I feel that the present trend of doing everything for the athlete is not
good. For example, I could put a timer on every swimmer in my practice,
keep all their splits for them with managers, but I do not because I
want them to be aware of what they are doing. Too often we do so much
for them that they stop using their brains, they stop thinking about
their own activities. It is important for the swimmer to know his own
times, so that he understands the significance of what he is doing.
Another place in which the coach fails the swimmer is when be allows
parents and others to come on the pool deck and engage him in
conversations during practices. The coach's responsibility is to the
swimmer, not to the parent or others. The swimmer is important; the
parents are not important. This is another example of where the coach
must recognize the important thing, the swimmer, and ignore the
unimportant, the parent.
The "X" factor is then, in other words, the ability to see what has to
be done and doing it. The great coach recognizes what is needed to do
the job and then does it. This applies not only in coaching, but in
business, in administration, in every aspect of life. Another way of
saying it is: cut through all the detail and get to the heart of the
matter. The perfectionist usually does not make a very good coach: he is
too busy taking care of the little details and seldom gets to the heart
of the matter.
At the present stage of development in swimming, the great coach must
have two basic abilities. He must be:
-a good organizer, and
-a good psychologist.
The good organizer will have the large team; he will attract the good
swimmers from other teams, he will develop the Mark Spitzes and the Gary
Halls of the future. The good psychologist will be able to handle the
parent problems; he will get along with the city council, he will be
able to communicate and get along with the swimmers, he will have the
"super" team.
The good coach today need have only an elementary knowledge of the areas
of conditioning, physiology and stroke mechanics. He does not need these
to get the job done today. However, nothing remains static, and in the
future these last two areas will become more and more important. As more
superior athletes come out for swimming, as more talented people go into
coaching, as more and better facilities become available, all of the
aspects of knowledge that we have discussed will become important.
I frankly feel that we are on the verge of a tremendous knowledge
explosion in the area of competitive swimming which will make the more
technical areas of knowledge more important to good coaching. These
meetings we are attending here should help us to separate the important
from the unimportant and make us better coaches. I would like to attend
this clinic a hundred years from now to see what is being discussed. By
that time they should have simple electronic devices that can be put in
the swimmer's ear to monitor pulse rates, blood lactate, and other such
physiological data. We are not ready for this sort of thing today, but
even a hundred years from today, the inherent behavioral patterns of the
swimmers will be the same as today: good coaching psychology today will
be good coaching psychology then.
In closing, I wish all of the speakers the best of luck in communicating
some of their "X" factor so that many of us can gain from this
conference. Finally, if Frank Zilch is here, I apologize to him.
This is an interesting article by Doc Counsilman, one of the legendary
coaches in American Swimming. Nowadays, ASCA has a Doc Counsilman
Lecture at every ASCA World Clinic to celebrate his contribution to
American, and indeed World Swimming. I urge coaches to spare some time
and read it, and to check out more articles on the ASCA website,
www.swimmingcoach.org. Its an old lecture. I reckon in the 80's but
has wonderful insights that may be helpful to coaches in understanding
how our ways of teaching impacts on our work as coaches.
Below is an article from the "Current Articles" page of the American
Swimming Coaches Association (ASCA) website. It can be found on the ASCA
website here:
http://www.swimmingcoach.org/articles/JL05142002.asp
- - - - - - - - - -
THE "X" FACTOR
by Dr. James "Doc" Counsilman
Is there any one factor or trait that determines a successful swimming
coach? If there is, could we educate a coach to have this particular trait?
The business world has long wondered what makes a good executive, a good
administrator, or a good salesman. Research into this ingredient of
success has led to the use of multimillion-dollar-testing bureaus. For
example, the executives of U.S. Steel are given personality tests,
intelligence tests, leadership ability tests and others in every
possible measurable area. So far they have had very little success in
identifying any single trait that their subjects have in common. For
instance, they sometimes find the lowest-paid filing clerk to have more
basic intelligence than the highest-paid executive. They have determined
that once a person reaches a level of intelligence somewhere above
average, that higher intelligence by itself is not necessarily a
determinant. So, we cannot give all coaches intelligence tests and
determine that the most intelligent will be the best coach. If this were
true, then all we would have to do to select a good coach is hire the
man with the highest I.Q. It might be just the opposite: a man with a
high I.Q. might be too smart to get involved in coaching.
Let's get back to the business world. I personally feel that
intelligence has a lot to do with success in coaching, in business, in
almost any field of endeavor. However, the type of intelligence I am
speaking of is not the type that can be measured by academic testing. It
could better be called a type of "perception". The business school at
Indiana University has found their search for a common denominator from
which to predict success to be rather fruitless. They have, however,
isolated an unidentifiable factor which they have named the "X" factor.
They can't sharply define this factor, but they talk about it, and they
feel they are closing in on a definition. I would like to apply this "X"
factor to swimming coaches.
They know a little about this factor in business, and I would like to
mention a few of the dangers encountered by business in attempting to
build a perfect administrator. Business has sent its top administrators
to training courses very much as you have come to this clinic. They send
them to universities and sometimes to the Menninger Foundation in
Kansas. The most outstanding business training course is given in Kansas
at the Menninger Psychiatric Clinic. Here, three times a year, a course
is offered to top executives at a fee of $1,200. Entrance is limited to
20 per group in three groups, and is called "Understanding Man."
Business sends its top executives to this clinic, the theory being that
with this type of training they will return and do a better job. Just as
many of you have come here and hope to return to your swimmers and do a
better job with them.
Unfortunately, business has found that many of its executives get back
from such a clinic and do worse. Likewise, many of our coaches go home
from these clinics and do a worse job of coaching than before. I can see
some of your kids now saying, "Oh my God, Coach has been to one of those
screwy clinics again. Now we get all of those screwy workouts and those
crazy ideas on stroke mechanics." I believe that we must continue to
experiment, to continually change our programs and our methods.
Therefore I do not recommend that we stop attending clinics such as
this, but I would caution you about one thing. There are examples of men
who have trained themselves to be coaches, devoted their entire lives to
that end, and failed miserably. Some of these men have been warned
before they start that they will fail, just as I now warn some of my
graduate students that they too will fail. Why do they fail? Let us take
a partially-true case and synthesize an individual. Give him a false
name, call him Frank Zilch.
Frank Zilch came to me some years ago and said, "I want to study under
you, learn all that you know, take all the scientific courses available,
so that I can become the greatest swimming coach in the world." Of
course, his approach was wrong; this was not the thing he should have
said. As his graduate advisor, I set out to plan his education.
Theoretically, he had everything going for him: he was good looking, he
had desire, he had lots of energy, he was intelligent, and with good
planning we should be able to make a great coach out of him. But, as it
turned out, it was an impossible task, because he lacked the "X" factor,
which we will discuss later. Frank Zilch read all the research on
swimming he could find; he read "Research Quarterly," "Swimming
Technique," "The Journal of Applied Physiology", and many, many others.
He attended all the coaching clinics he could find, he did research, he
lived, he ate, his every thought and every waking minute was applied to
swimming. We designed his courses to cover every area of knowledge
possible that could contribute toward making him a great swimming coach.
He knew more facts about swimming than any person in the world--his
brain was crammed with swimming knowledge.
In setting up his course of study we tried to give him a full education
in the areas necessary to make him a great swimming coach. He had to be
a great physiologist to understand the process of conditioning: what
happens to the swimmer's body when he trains. The perfect coach should
know that the swimmer's body changes as he trains. He should understand
these physiological changes that occur. In preparing the perfect coach
for this area of knowledge, he should certainly read Dr. Selye's book on
stress and adaptation. Frank Zilch studied all of this.
The thought must occur to you: does all of this really seem necessary?
We all wonder if we should not concentrate on just training the
swimmers, and let Dr. Selye and others do this type of research. Maybe
we should learn by trial-and-error, by either overworking or
underworking our swimmers. Most of the U.S. progress in training
technique has occurred through trial-and-error. The Europeans, in
particular those from the Iron Curtain countries, are usually surprised
and disappointed when they visit training sites in the United States,
and fail to see the American coaches taking pulse rates and
electrocardiograms. They expect American coaches to be more scientific:
they expect us to take pulse rates, they expect us to take
electrocardiograms, and to measure all physiological changes in our
swimmers.
During a recent trip to Russia, I gave an hour lecture at the Russian
Institute for Physical Education in Minsk. During the question and
answer period, the questions were entirely on minute details such as:
"Did the swimmers take vitamins?" "How many milligrams of Vitamin C did
they take?" "Do you measure their electrocardiograms?" They asked no
questions on training of swimmers, on repeats, etc. Later we had a
special conference with officials of the Russian sports field. There
were about six or eight sitting about the table. They had a
nutritionist, an expert on fluid mechanics, a physiologist; the only
thing missing was a swimming coach. Again, the questions were on, in my
opinion, irrelevant subjects. Their favorite question was on the "IT"
wave. Then they asked the 64-ruble question. They wanted to know why
they were not getting better swimmers in spite of spending millions of
rubles. They asked if they were behind the times; they asked what we in
the U.S. were doing that they were not. I told them that they were
actually far ahead of our country in scientific methods, but they did
not understand. I think the Russians are missing the "X" factor.
We have had similar experiences with the East Germans. They too are
going about their swimming on a very scientific basis. They select their
future athletes on a scientific basis, as they are also doing for their
future scientists, mathematicians, physicists. When an East German child
shows promise in any area--math, science, sport, etc.--he and his family
are often moved so the child can be enrolled in a special school or
institute that is designed to nurture this skill. The East Germans, like
the Russians, wonder why they are not having greater success in these
areas. The answer is, again, I believe the "X" factor.
In the United States we throw our 500,000 age-group swimmers into the
pool and let the best survive. The ones that come out on top have the
physical ability and have fought their way to the top through hard,
merciless work. We do not coddle our swimmers. Our swimmers, also the
Canadian and Australian swimmers, are not pampered. We throw them all in
the pool and let the best survive. I favor this system over the
scientific approach of the Russians and East Germans. They approach
things too scientifically and forget that it is a dog-eat-dog
competition. The Americans, the Australians, the Canadians and a few
others produce the toughest swimmers because of the system that forces
them to fight their way to the top. This is why these swimmers are the
toughest in the Olympics and other international meets.
In business they have a saying: you never see a good-looking salesman. I
don't know how really true this is, but possibly he doesn't sell much
because he is too busy with the farmer's daughter. The point is, I
believe: you want to stay away from people who have everything going for
them. I have yet to have a good swimmer who was talented physically and
also well-adjusted. A person can have all the physical and mental
attributes and not do well, because the person with everything going for
him does not have a strong ego-drive. Perhaps this ego-drive is part of
the "X" factor we have been talking about. http://www.swimmingcoach.org/articles/JL05142002.asp
Now back to Frank Zilch.
He had everything going for him. We trained him to be a good
physiologist; now we will train him in stroke mechanics. He studied
physics, fluid mechanics. He studied underwater movies; he learned all
about Bernouili's principle. He studied every aspect of stroke
mechanics. Another area in which the Europeans seem surprised to find
that American coaches are not spending more time on the deck is with
stroke mechanics. I do not believe any coach could teach Mark Spitz to
swim the way he does; much of this he has done on his own. The better a
swimmer is, the less he really has to be coached. If you have a Mark
Spitz, just sit back and enjoy him and try to learn from him.
How does a swimmer learn? He learns through trial-and-error. Why doesn't
everybody learn the same? Because we all have varying abilities.
We have photographed dogs swimming, and have learned that not all dogs
swim naturally--in fact some nearly drowned. We found that at first most
dogs tried to swim with all four feet, then gradually learned to pick up
the hind feet and swim only with the front feet. However, in the case of
the Labrador Retriever, they learned to swim this way usually on the
second time in the water: much sooner than other types of dogs. We
studied the Dachshund, and on the twentieth time in the water he was
still trying to work all four feet and nearly drowned.
I believe the Gary Halls, the John Kinsellas, the Mark Spitzes, are the
Labrador Retrievers. Unfortunately, most of you will get a lot of
Dachshunds in your programs. So many of our great swimmers swim well in
spite of us lousy coaches--those of us who work only with the Labrador
Retrievers have a real advantage. So, you club coaches, keep on sending
us the Labrador Retrievers and keep the Dachshunds.
Those of us with the top-20 college teams just go out and recruit the
Labrador Retrievers from the local coaches, so we don't have to know
very much about stroke mechanics. The better the swimmer, the less you
have to work on stroke mechanics. I believe stroke mechanics are
extremely important, but at the lower levels. The best stroke-mechanics
men in the U.S. are the lesser-known coaches in the local programs.
We now have Frank Zilch well qualified in physiology, and in stroke
mechanics. Next we go to what I feel is the most important area of all:
psychology. This is one area in which the Russians and East Germans were
very complimentary to the Americans. They marveled at the rapport that
American coaches have with American swimmers. They have remarked at what
great psychologists the American coaches are; how they can motivate the
swimmers in spite of the fact that we don't do scientific testing and
don't work with stroke mechanics.
I believe that if you gave three different coaches:
-one a psychologist,
-one a stroke-mechanics expert, and
-one a physiologist,
identical teams, that the psychologist would win every time. A good
psychologist can motivate his swimmers to work hard and to dedicate
themselves to the sport. They can keep the swimmers happy so they will
enjoy the sport and stay with it. They can recruit the best swimmers.
They can handle the city council and the parents. The good psychologist
in time will become a good organizer and administrator, and will have a
large team and attract the Mark Spitzes and the Gary Halls to his team.
So, this is the way to become a good coach.
Finally, let me tell you what I think the "X" factor is in successful
coaching. The "X" factor is, to quote an old saying: the ability to
separate the wheat from the chaff. Another way of expressing it is to
say: you must be able to recognize the important things and work on
them; and to minimize the unimportant. Let me give you an example.
We have seen mothers and fathers, and a few coaches, walking up and down
the pool deck as the swimmer is swimming with dropped elbows,
over-kicking like mad, and he is being yelled at, "kick, kick, kick." In
other words, they ignore the important item, the dropped elbows, and
emphasize the unimportant by yelling "kick, kick."
I feel that the present trend of doing everything for the athlete is not
good. For example, I could put a timer on every swimmer in my practice,
keep all their splits for them with managers, but I do not because I
want them to be aware of what they are doing. Too often we do so much
for them that they stop using their brains, they stop thinking about
their own activities. It is important for the swimmer to know his own
times, so that he understands the significance of what he is doing.
Another place in which the coach fails the swimmer is when be allows
parents and others to come on the pool deck and engage him in
conversations during practices. The coach's responsibility is to the
swimmer, not to the parent or others. The swimmer is important; the
parents are not important. This is another example of where the coach
must recognize the important thing, the swimmer, and ignore the
unimportant, the parent.
The "X" factor is then, in other words, the ability to see what has to
be done and doing it. The great coach recognizes what is needed to do
the job and then does it. This applies not only in coaching, but in
business, in administration, in every aspect of life. Another way of
saying it is: cut through all the detail and get to the heart of the
matter. The perfectionist usually does not make a very good coach: he is
too busy taking care of the little details and seldom gets to the heart
of the matter.
At the present stage of development in swimming, the great coach must
have two basic abilities. He must be:
-a good organizer, and
-a good psychologist.
The good organizer will have the large team; he will attract the good
swimmers from other teams, he will develop the Mark Spitzes and the Gary
Halls of the future. The good psychologist will be able to handle the
parent problems; he will get along with the city council, he will be
able to communicate and get along with the swimmers, he will have the
"super" team.
The good coach today need have only an elementary knowledge of the areas
of conditioning, physiology and stroke mechanics. He does not need these
to get the job done today. However, nothing remains static, and in the
future these last two areas will become more and more important. As more
superior athletes come out for swimming, as more talented people go into
coaching, as more and better facilities become available, all of the
aspects of knowledge that we have discussed will become important.
I frankly feel that we are on the verge of a tremendous knowledge
explosion in the area of competitive swimming which will make the more
technical areas of knowledge more important to good coaching. These
meetings we are attending here should help us to separate the important
from the unimportant and make us better coaches. I would like to attend
this clinic a hundred years from now to see what is being discussed. By
that time they should have simple electronic devices that can be put in
the swimmer's ear to monitor pulse rates, blood lactate, and other such
physiological data. We are not ready for this sort of thing today, but
even a hundred years from today, the inherent behavioral patterns of the
swimmers will be the same as today: good coaching psychology today will
be good coaching psychology then.
In closing, I wish all of the speakers the best of luck in communicating
some of their "X" factor so that many of us can gain from this
conference. Finally, if Frank Zilch is here, I apologize to him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)